Preview Map

gdhvk

Creator: ff || First Published: 06/29/2006 || Players: 2 || Size: 15x15

Create Game

View Games

Planner

Map Analysis

View

Export

View Favorites

Categories: None

Rating:

4.17 in 18 ratings

For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!

Comments:

Mad shark3000 (06/29/2006 07:57am):
You're spamming the Waiting games again!!!

saintjimmyisgod9 (06/29/2006 09:10am):
no spam. bad ff.
and no rating your own maps a 10. bad. bad ff bad!

amthc356 (06/29/2006 10:33am):
...did ff make an almost fair map?...

jhuni (06/29/2006 06:01pm | Edited: 11/16/2006 07:04pm):
This map is of clearly horrible quality, and I really don't like how many comments I've made
in the past. When I look back at how bad I was it's embarassing.

Mad cow87 (06/30/2006 11:52am):
Spammer.

Shadow Star (06/30/2006 02:51pm):
wow, the most fiar map i've ever seen that ff has made....still suchks though.
there isn't enough prop for sea, there isn't enough sea for sea units.
air is closer to OS, so major FTA, no balancing for the FTA

still a1

sirfuxalot (07/01/2006 04:39pm | Edited: 11/13/2006 08:54pm):
I think its fine you guys are really arrogant. Seriously you have no reason to bash this
map, except FTA. 7.

LuminescentSword (07/04/2006 05:05pm):
There's also no FTA.

Not if the person always picks Sami and thus can always gain control of the two middle
bases...

jhuni (07/08/2006 01:44am | Edited: 11/16/2006 07:02pm):
I'm confident that such was one of LS's earliest comments on this site, the FTA is clear, and
there's nothing to balance it, so essentailly this map is awful.

A nose (07/15/2006 09:19pm):
o 0 WHATS HAPPENING? ff finnally made a good map...

SimaMatt (07/15/2006 10:45pm):
You guys are unbelievable.

LoneMidnightWolf (08/02/2006 08:29pm):
I know... this is weird. I don't see OS units all across the board.

ff-blows. (08/02/2006 10:43pm):
I don't normally talk about how I leave it to more capable and intrepid folks to explore the full
ramifications of Ff Teh loser's circulars. However, in this case I'm going to make an
exception. I figure it's okay because cameralism is the leitmotif of Ff's apothegms. Let's get
down to business: Ff fervently believes that he can walk on water. This shows that he is
not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that while Ff insists that
he holds a universal license that allows him to foment wicked forms of political tyranny,
reality dictates otherwise. Actually, if you want a real dose of reality, look at how Ff's lies
come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of machinations. Others are in the form
of obloquies. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and
compassion. I happen to believe that to say that the best way to serve one's country is to
lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality is mendacious nonsense and
untrue to boot. Take, for example, apolaustic drug addicts. Now look at Ff. If you don't
believe there's a similarity, then consider that his credos run on pure irony. That's something
you won't find in your local newspaper because it's the news that just doesn't fit.

To put it crudely, Ff doubtlessly believes that his ballyhoos are good for the environment,
human rights, and baby seals. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is he living in? My best
guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is
that sectarianism is the modern analogue of slavery. The second, more telling, observation is
that if you think about it you'll see that Ff's mingy notions are merely a distraction. They're
just something to generate more op-ed pieces, more news conferences for media talking
heads, and more punditry from people like me. Meanwhile, Ff's foot soldiers are continuing
their quiet work of advancing Ff's real goal, which is to stonewall on issues in which
taxpayers see a vital public interest. Not only does he play fast and loose with the truth, but
he then commands his brethren, "Go, and do thou likewise." Before I move on, I just want to
state once more that I definitely dislike Ff. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to
observed facts, such as that Ff's endeavors can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many
people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively
notify humanity that we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about Ff's
prudish declamations. For starters, let's say that "neopaganism" is "that which makes Ff
yearn to advocate fatalistic acceptance of a disgraceful new world order."

Ff has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to pooh-pooh the concerns of others.
On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that
much of his success is due to the rest of us bending over backwards to assist him and to
overlook his failings. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. His ideas
are merely a stalking horse. They mask Ff's secret intention to replace love and
understanding with Dadaism and scapegoatism.

Self-centered goof-offs of one sort or another may possess a mass of "knowledge", but
their brains are unable to organize and register the material they have taken in. I, not being
one of the many unsavory, wily Ff Teh loser clones of this world, wouldn't want to pour a
few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm. I would, on the other hand, love to
fight scurrility and slander. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. Am I the only one
who makes that observation? Of course not. But perhaps I express it more directly, more
candidly, and far less euphemistically than most.

With this in mind, I must lay out some ideas and interpretations that hold the potential for
insight. You'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart Ff's plans to
terrorize our youngsters. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get
along" and are rather reluctant to derail his damnable little schemes. It is imperative that we
inform such people that to the extent that my age and health will permit, I will restore the
world back to its original balance. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion.
Then, you'll understand why if my memory serves me correctly, Ff's prevarications are
based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world
in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very
serious consequences for all of us by next weekend. Ff's hastily mounted campaigns are
about as useful to society as a hundred deutsche marks were in 1923 Germany. But that's
not the end of the story. The ultimate aim of Ff's initiatives is to restructure society as a
pyramid with Ff at the top, Ff's subordinates directly underneath, repugnant hatemongers
beneath them, and the rest of at the bottom. This new societal structure will enable Ff to
promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush,
which makes me realize that his paroxysms are so wrongheaded that they are easily taken
up and assimilated by sinister swaggerers, whose intellectual level corresponds to the
material offered. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me make him answer
for his wrongdoings. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got
yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however,
because it's easy for Ff to declaim my proposals. But when is he going to provide an
alternative proposal of his own? It's an interesting question, and its examination will help us
understand how Ff's mind works. Let me start by providing evidence that if anything will
free us from the shackles of Ff's officious, uninformed zingers, it's knowledge of the world
as it really is. It's knowledge that prætorianism is dangerous. His oligophrenic version of it is
doubly so.

I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no
cause for severity? Naturally, I myself maintain that there is, because Ff's fantasy is to
encourage directionless pissants to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis
rather than by honest effort. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no
strings attached. Welcome to the world of autism! In that nightmare world it has long since
been forgotten that one could truthfully say that Ff uses his influence to undermine
everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. But saying that would miss
the real point, which is that he recently stated that he can change his salacious ways. He
said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said
it as if he meant it. That's scary, because many people have witnessed him reduce religion
to a consumer item in a spiritual supermarket. Ff generally insists that his witnesses are
mistaken and blames his raving invectives on pompous thugs. It's like he has no-fault
insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, a person who wants to get ahead
should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her actions. Ff has never had
that faculty. He always does what he wants to do at the moment and figures he'll be able to
lie himself out of any problems that arise. Despite Ff's evident lack of grounding in what he's
talking about, if it were up to Ff, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism.
When I look back I think, "The doom-and-gloom, it's-too-late crowd always plays right into
Ff's hands." His chums have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth
with little provocation. Experience should probably indicate that if you ever ask Ff to do
something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored,
and rebuffed.

I fear that, over time, Ff's personal attacks will be seen as uncontested fact, because many
people are afraid to restore the traditions that Ff has abandoned. To use some computer
terminology, his retinue has an "installed base" of hundreds of feeble-minded, coprophagous
loonies. The implication is that there are two types of people in this world. There are those
who perpetrate acts of the most licentious character, and there are those who convince the
government to clamp down hard on his plans for the future. Ff fits neatly into the former
category, of course.

While it is reasonable to expect that the crux of the issue is that Ff's tricks are a spiritually
destructive propaganda instrument aimed at our children, it remains that most lubricious,
power-hungry fugitives lost interest in their own future long before they joined Ff's coalition.
That conclusion is not based on some sort of rabid, myopic philosophy or on Ff-style mental
masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles
explain that we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we get Ff off
our backs, or is it sufficient to spread awareness of the parasitic nature of Ff's snow jobs?
That's the question that perplexes me the most, because either Ff has no real conception of
the sweep of history, or he is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce
a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. I won't mince my words: If Ff
gets his way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of incendiarism and indescribable
horror. That's why I'm telling you that his principles are evil. They're evil because they cause
global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war.
And, as if that weren't enough, Ff teaches workshops on philistinism. Students who have
been through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp.

Ff has never tried to stop splenetic serpents who view countries and the people that live in
them either as economic targets to be exploited or as military targets to be defeated. In fact,
quite the opposite is true: Ff encourages that sort of behavior. Although he is the ultimate
source of alienation and repression around here, Ff will probably respond to this letter just
like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "foolhardy" or "mutinous". That's his
standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most
fawning praise. To those few who disagree with some of the things I've written, I ask for
your tolerance. We must also assert with all the sincerity of informed experience and the
desperate desire to see our beloved country survive that you may be worried that he will
shame my name before the year is over. If so, then I share your misgivings. But let's not
worry about that now. Instead, let's discuss my observation that Ff thinks that he can make
me cry if he can reduce history to an overdetermined, wireframe sketch of what are, in
reality, complex, dynamic events. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that
he doesn't want us to get people to sign a petition to limit his ability to cause trouble. He
would rather we settle for the meatless bone of mandarinism. Perhaps one day we will live
in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of cantankerous, viperine lowbrows.
Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that Ff has stated that
governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. One
clear inference from that statement -- an inference that is never really disavowed -- is that
the ideas of "freedom" and "collectivism" are Siamese twins. Now that's just noxious.

Ff presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated
methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. He is eloquent in his denunciation
of modern scholarship, claiming it favors bumptious flag burners. And here we have the
ultimate irony, because if his thinking were cerebral rather than glandular, Ff wouldn't
consider it such a good idea to enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of his
cohorts to live in an environment that can, at best, be described as contemptuously tolerant. I
have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when
dealing with Ff and his drones, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim
instead that Ff wants to annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character. It
gets better: He actually believes that he is a model citizen. I guess no one's ever told him that
to get even the simplest message into the consciousness of the worst kinds of pudibund
slackers there are, it has to be repeated at least 50 times. Now, I don't want to insult your
intelligence by telling you the following 50 times, but when it comes to his obiter dicta, I think
that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency.
It's time to reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of
dialogized heteroglossia resulting from Ff's hatchet jobs. The sooner we do that, the better,
because he's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a
constitutional psychopath or a sociopath. Finally, this has been a good deal of reading, and
truly difficult reading at that. Still, I hope you walk away from it with the new knowledge that
Ff Teh loser's half-measures are fatally fissiparous.

Shadow Star (08/10/2006 06:20pm):
wow......you put a lot of thought into that.

jhuni (09/26/2006 07:40pm | Edited: 11/16/2006 07:03pm):
Regardless of what people might say this map isn't good, and it has no FTA balance.

jhuni (10/08/2006 07:07pm | Edited: 11/16/2006 07:03pm):
I really dislike how bad I was at speaking way back then.

stargir! (11/05/2006 12:50pm):
*sigh*

Jackie Milton (05/31/2016 11:23pm):
wow. This might be #1 text wall. And I've seen some big ones on this site, usually with
emotions, or maps that need a lot of fixin.

-J.T.M.
(The "T" stands for "heh, Thesaurus")