Warrior Zone 3
Creator: Ultra Storm 2 || First Published: 07/27/2006 || Players: 14 || Size: 30x20
Categories: None
Rating: 7.79 in 29 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
Ultra Storm 2 (07/27/2006 02:12pm | Edited: 07/30/2006 03:30pm):
Unfinished 14 player map. It's a team map, obviously. The upper side vs. the lower side.
Play with 1500-2000 funds so you actually get to build decent stuff. Remember to ban
Kindle or her COP willl rip the game to pieces. Maybe ban Sensei too. And black bombs are
an obvious ban.
Shadow Star (07/27/2006 02:18pm | Edited: 07/27/2006 05:37pm):
now all we need are bases, units, cities, terrain, and it'll be ok.

well....probably.

Edit: looks good, oddly enough less cramped then most of the other 14 player games i've
seen.
nyvelion2 (07/29/2006 12:06pm):
It would be easier to know not to start any games on it yet if you put something like
"Unfinished" at the end of the map name, instead of making it small part of a map comment
that no-one will see.
gunner1138 (07/29/2006 02:24pm):
Woot, piperunners!
jhuni (07/31/2006 01:04am | Edited: 10/29/2006 02:31pm):
Sorry, this post was to sarcastic, but I expected you people to understand 'sarcasm' better
especially with a excessive degree of exclamation marks.
felix45 (08/09/2006 07:23pm):
.....jhuni, if a map has a missle silo and a comm tower in it that doesn't mean it is automatically
bad.
mickmick124 (08/10/2006 05:00pm | Edited: 08/19/2006 11:12am):
It seems that the 4 teams in the middle have a disadvantage due to the lack of an airport, but
it looks like the seaports try to make up for it. They would still be defenceless against stealth
bombers.
jhuni (09/19/2006 10:25pm | Edited: 10/29/2006 02:25pm):
What this post was saying is that most of the maps on this site, are awful, with FF, xeliaong,
grizly-sword, cow, ogre, and several others flooding with horrible maps.

Edited to a higher level.
jenkins (09/27/2006 03:34pm | Edited: 09/27/2006 03:36pm):
That seems to be the only punctuation mark you know how to use, albeit excessively.
Honestly, if you're going to rant about a map being bad (which this isn't), at least do so
coherently. You look like a fool.

That said, the map seems great, but surely the central teams are at a drawback--fewer
properties for them to capture, and more people clamoring over them. Meh, I wouldn't
suggest changing it, though. I think this map is in its ideal form right now.

9/10
jhuni (10/29/2006 02:46pm | Edited: 10/29/2006 02:52pm):
▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
RE: That seems to be the only punctuation mark you know how to use, albeit excessively
▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒

That is nonsencial, you didn't indicate what punctuation mark, and if you were reffering to
my orginal post of course I used exclamation marks excessively to demonstrate sarcasm.

▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
RE: Honestly, if you're going to rant about a map being bad (which this isn't), at least
do so coherently. You look like a fool.
▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒

First of all, I wasn't ranting I only said that good maps were in a exaggerated sense nearing
extiniction, but that was justified with my later post, and thats far from being a rant FYI. If
my orginal comment -- (not a rant) wasn't coherent enough even with the given exclamation
marks, then don't say that " I ranted about it being a bad map," if it's not coherent, so I
guess I'd have to agree that my orginal post wasn't coherent to some people. It had nothing
to do with how good this map was, but a general statement on how bad most maps are on
this site are with people like FF make bad maps at the time of that post. I admit: I am greatly
superior to my previous self though, but that doesn't mean I'm a fool.

▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
RE: Meh, I wouldn't suggest changing it, though. I think this map is in its ideal form right now.
9/10
▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒

Now you have made it `coherent´ that you don't have a very good idea of what ideal is.

Simple deductive reasoning is given:
Definition of ideal: the idea of something that is perfect
Given: Rating for 10 is (near perfect).
Prove: You contradicted yourself, and either you have don't know what ideal is (which I
doubt), or you don't know how to rate maps.

▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
jenkins (09/27/2006 02:34pm): You look like a fool.
▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒

You had no basis for that statement, but I have a basis that you look like a fool.
GDIblakdragen (12/20/2006 11:18am):
..... well, the important thing is that you tried jhuni. Love it, love it, love it!!! 10/10

Also, I don't see you making any decent maps, or any for that matter, jhuni.
Mantimus Prime (12/20/2006 05:30pm | Edited: 12/20/2006 05:31pm):
"Simple deductive reasoning is given:
Definition of ideal: the idea of something that is perfect
Given: Rating for 10 is (near perfect)."

Rule one, don't use semantics for an argument <_<

That being said, looks really good. Very varied.
DJ-Moogle (07/23/2009 07:16pm):
this map is a piece of junk, it just screams cheap unit spam or indirect standoff
chrisdaboss (09/24/2009 09:18pm):
i like it, but why on earth is there 1 purple lightning unit, but 0 other team units?????
xboxyo (03/21/2011 04:19pm):
how do i play????
xboxyo (03/21/2011 04:24pm):
when does my turn come??
Madd Maxx (10/18/2011 04:33am):
really nice map! 10/10
pen (03/18/2012 10:59pm):
I'd hate to sound unkind but this is just a bad map and is undeserving of it's ratings
(which should be halved). It looks like a mech flood and to top it off, most nations are
taking heat from both sides. This map screams Sami or Kindle... Mech floods, boots and
crammed cities man it sounds like some sort of natural disaster. Half of the players will
leave by day 2.

You should make sure that the most powerful nations (The end ones) are the last ones to
move. This makes PL and TG right where they should be but OS and BM could be swapped for
CI and PC. The neighbor's cities can just be grabbed, but that damage is irreversible.

GET RID OF PL's PREDEPLOYED INFANTRY!



Veritech (09/13/2013 11:42pm):
Ban Koal, there's a road.
Nyvelion (12/29/2014 03:39pm):
Looks good now.
CCCP (01/20/2017 03:42am):
Ban Kindle, there are properties.



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.