Creator: Bum || First Published: 03/04/2025 || Players: 2 || Size: 20x20



































































Categories: A-Rank, Under Review, Fog of War | ||
|
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat! |
Comments: |
Bum (03/04/2025 08:07pm):
For fog of war |
MontySigurdson (03/08/2025 06:53am | Edited: 03/08/2025 08:33pm):
Interesting, though I think the preowned airport could cause FTA in certain scenarios since T-Copter order is ABAB. If you make the (12,19) city preowned and move it to the (00,19) corner and change the airport to neutral, this should be fixed. B-ranking for now. EDIT: Re-newed after changes. |
QuailQuail (03/28/2025 08:36pm | Edited: 03/28/2025 09:56pm):
Map designed only to mech and copter spam. Zero ability to front switch. Zero ability to break choke points before COs like Hawke or Olaf spam you to death. Really awful all around. |
Noobplaine (06/05/2025 03:17pm):
Horrible map. If you don't know the opener as a first time player of the map you instantly lose to someone who does (@getgood, talking about you ggwping me to map knowledge), please remove from LL as this literally does not play well at all. |
MontySigurdson (06/05/2025 03:45pm | Edited: 06/05/2025 05:43pm):
Removed from Live (at least temporarily) to make sure that there are no knowledge checks in the opening. Specifically, skipping the 1st capture near the river base to go for the airport + T-Copter immediately might be the go-to here - on the other hand, Recons might be strong as well. According to Astaroth, there might also be TA with d3 Recons + the Missile vision where P1's Recon can apparently move into a forest before the enemy Missile can spot it but the same is not true for P2's d3 Recon. Overall, I think the 'Under Review' process should be a good way to gather data on balance, potential openings and the Live-viability of the map. |
Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.