Create Game
View Games
Planner
Map Analysis
View
Export
View Favorites
| Categories: None | ||
|
| For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat! |
| Comments: |
|
BlackBelt (10/05/2006 09:47pm):
W W 3 : i know its unbalanced, but war is never fair. I made four major powers so i suggest if you not one you sould make an aliance with one. also if you are a major power you might still have to make an aliance just to beat another major power. have fun killing! |
|
jhuni (10/05/2006 09:51pm | Edited: 10/05/2006 10:09pm):
It looks nice though on the map and you forgot to give america enough nukes to kill everybody and itself. Edit: Also why are most of the nukes on antartica, and the artic? Antartica super power FTW Russia has some missile silos (nukes) and GS doesnt. |
|
Doghealer66 (10/05/2006 09:58pm):
That map has way too many predeployed units for me to even care. I'm not going to bother counting that. No rating... |
|
BlackBelt (10/05/2006 10:01pm):
lol yah i guess i could of gave more nukes to america...... but then the #1 major power would never lose. the world at this point could easily gang up on the USA and defeat it but if USA teams up with Canada and UK then Bush could win. Or mabe China and Germany will defeat all who stand in there way. |
|
bakabonest (10/05/2006 10:03pm):
Waahh.... I doubt it'll be playable, but I'll give you a ten for the effort |
|
Rigel (10/05/2006 10:15pm):
is this really supposed to be a gang up on america thing because it doesn't look like america is anywhere near the top power here. The way I see it, with so few cities around the "number one major power" will always lose. In fact, now that I look at it, Russia will almost always win, even though it's facing several fronts. |
|
Patashu Mapmule I (10/06/2006 06:23am | Edited: 10/06/2006 06:26am):
Australia doesn't have ice on the bottom. IMO, everyone should be sturm so that the predeployed units aren't cleaned in an instant. And the USA should definitely be stronger. |
|
Mr. Cannon (10/06/2006 07:03am):
=O |
|
Mr. Snack (10/06/2006 02:07pm):
Mein EYES |
|
sirfuxalot (10/06/2006 04:23pm):
jhuni (10/06/2006 12:51am): It looks nice though on the map and you forgot to give america enough nukes to kill everybody and itself. Just about every country in the U.N. has more than enough to do what you are describing. It's not likely countries will ever use nukes, not even Iran or N. Korea. They just use them for leverage. |
|
A nose (10/06/2006 06:02pm):
... |
|
black-kaito (10/06/2006 07:13pm):
Hmm... if I set all COs except Drake, I'll be able to have a clear views... |
|
oomouwmouw (10/07/2006 08:38pm):
wow... BH has 3 comm towers... hmmmmmm...... |
|
jhuni (10/27/2006 12:55pm):
Simple deductive reasoning of the nuclear weapons is reproduced. Given: Every developed country is in the U.N. Given: About every country in the U.N. has enough to do what you are describing. Prove: Just about every country in the world has enough nukes to wipe out the entire earth. Reason: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:UN_Members.png The whole world is in the U.N except for one African country. Reason: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nuclear_weapon_programs_worldwidenew.png Barely less then all of Africa is in the U.N, and 0% of Africa has nukes. Australia, Greenland, Canada, South America, Mexico, and Mongolia are all in the U.N, and don't have Nukes. Given: 55% or more of the U.N don't have nukes. Disprove: Just about every country in the U.N (the world) has more than enough to do what you are describing Given: The united kingdom, France, China, Russia, and the united states are the main nuclear threats. Given: 400 nukes is about enough to wipe out eurasia Given: Russia, and the United states are the only countries with more then 400 nukes. Prove: Only 2 countries can do what im describing which is much less then the whole world. You need to learn your facts. |
|
oomouwmouw (10/27/2006 10:04pm | Edited: 10/27/2006 10:11pm):
lol. wikipedia. We're not allowed to use that for research in school. = \ hmm... Now lets see. I do agree that not every country can end the world. But any one country using a nuke would cause a chain reaction where everyone else uses their nukes (including the "only 2 countries" capable of doing it. Given: 55% or more of the U.N don't have nukes. And what keeps them from lying about their nuclear status? Not like any one can really find out unless they test it. Given: 400 nukes is about enough to wipe out eurasia How many is needed depends on how you explode them. You'd need a lot less if you plan on doing an airburst instead of a ground attack. Given: Russia, and the United states are the only countries with more then 400 nukes. That doesn't even matter... Chances are, if anyone uses a nuke, they'll set of a chain reaction where everyone gets nuked back to the stone age. (go look at siop simulations) conclusion: you need to learn how to properly analyse the facts. (and maybe do more then flipping through wikipedia for stats and numbers) http://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/warplan/index.asp NRDC simulation. Look at those pdf files on the side to see the US's operational nuclear attack plan. (this one happens to be a simulated attack on Russia) |
Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.