Creator: GameMusic || First Published: 10/29/2006 || Players: 2 || Size: 5x5
Categories: None
Rating: 3.80 in 5 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
felix45 (10/29/2006 07:23am):
put BM infantry on its starting base or get rid of the OS infantry. (for FTA ballance)
GameMusic (10/29/2006 07:45am | Edited: 10/29/2006 08:06am):
I guess moving the infantry up would give BM more
options, so that OS doesn't set the strategy of the game.
thebiglol (10/29/2006 08:11am):
staring at this map for too long makes me feel crazy :/
Teegarden (10/29/2006 10:15am):
6/10. Most ppl are prob'ly going to downvote you b/c of OS infantry on HQ even with the
neutral city (not enough funds to matter so much), but if you play this map on FoW this is
completely negated IMO. On turn two if BM saved up last turn can buy a recon for an earlly
advantage. A good map, but not amazing.
felix45 (10/29/2006 11:01am):
I think a map test is in order, its hard to tell if this is balanced or not. I would definatley say
this map is balanced if both players are sami, but if not that is questionable.
GameMusic (10/29/2006 10:54pm):
Here's how it works:

The FTA balance is 1 city and 1 square extra on the BM infantry. Both sides can use their
infantry either to capture or to interfere with a capture. You also might use your
infantry to get on the mount in in FOW. That's 3 different uses for the startng infantry,
and the choice that OS makes doesn't force BM to be locked into any strategy. Neither
side can take the base uncontested if the opponent fights them for it (unless they're
Sami, Sturm, or Kanbei).
Nyvelion (04/26/2014 08:22pm):
Looks fair enough now.



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.