Three Done Fair
Creator: Belgain Roffles || First Published: 10/30/2006 || Players: 3 || Size: 39x32
Categories: B-Rank, FFA Multiplay, Standard, Teleport Tile
Rating: 8.71 in 35 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
felix45 (10/30/2006 05:01pm | Edited: 10/30/2006 05:02pm):
omg sexy *humps*

a ballanced 3p map that isnt a 2v1, but an actual FFA!

edit: that 10 is mine bitches
jhuni (10/31/2006 09:21pm):
@Felix45: Sorry, but your wrong. This map is far from balanced which I will explain shortly,
but in refference to "ballanced," I'm sorry maybe it means something different in whatever
language your speaking, because theres no such word in english.

Also your in no place to be calling people -- "bitches."

The reason this map isn't balanced is that a one base FTA isn't balanced by an infantry, it
just gives STA GE > YC or BM.
felix45 (11/01/2006 06:11am | Edited: 11/01/2006 06:30am):
bitches bitches bitches. hey bitchy mc bitch bitch! I got something for you!

I say what I please bitch.

And I'm sorry mr. grammar nazi, I meant to say balanced. OMG GRAMMAR NAZI COMING
TO GET ME.

edit: omg you seriously think that one infantry is too much FTA ballance?
ROFL
son, you really arent very smart. Check whirly, another one of CM's maps. look at the
statistics on it. the wins go both ways over hundreds of games and it has a single infantry to
counter FTA. That is undeinable proof that shows how one infantry counters the FTA, so
suck on that.

edit 2: here's the map son. http://awbw.amarriner.com/prevmaps.php?maps_id=8709
jhuni (11/01/2006 06:32pm | Edited: 11/01/2006 06:37pm):
RE: omg you seriously think that one infantry is too much FTA ballance?

Emphasis on "one base," read my post more throughly please?

I wasn't reffering to the wide range of possiblites of maps, but this map alone. One infantry
doesn't balance a one base FTA, it just gives STA even nahbein said so before, but in more
concise terms.

RE: That is undeinable proof that shows how one infantry counters the FTA.

"It's undeinable proof" of something I wasn't even arguing about, so all of that is immediatly
disproved, and dismissed due to invalidity.

Re: son, you really arent very smart.

And you don't know how to spell balanced, because for some reason you think it has two
l's, plus your arguing about something so silly it's hilarious. You didn't understand the
precise content of my post to argue with what I was really reffering to. The statement "I'm
not very smart" again has no basis it's just your consistent need to flame.

RE: OMG GRAMMAR NAZI COMING TO GET ME. bitches bitches bitches. hey bitchy mc

Your flaming is only going to make yourself look bad.

felix45 (11/01/2006 07:08pm):
each country starts with 2 bases. are you blind? can you not count? are you really so dumb?


OMG GRAMMAR NAZI STILL GETTING OFF TO HOW I SPELLED BALANCED EARLIER
OMGOMGOMG

bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch
jhuni (11/02/2006 07:37pm | Edited: 11/02/2006 08:57pm):
You debate at a appallingly low level.

1 infantry per base is in terms reduced to a one base FTA. Theres 2-infantry-2-bases,
which is the same idea with 1-infantry-1-base, thus the same conclusion from a one base
FTA can be made, if you have the mere ability of reduction.

Don't call me stupid when it's conspicuously invalidated after even a brief veiwing of are
comments, one thing to look at is your clear need to flame and that there all uncorroborated.

▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
RE: GRAMMAR NAZI STILL GETTING OFF TO HOW I SPELLED BALANCED EARLIER
▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒

It's not just your lack of good spelling, but a variety of other indications that your comments
are of low quailty. You miss spelled "balanced" twice: "FTA ballance," and "a ballanced 3p
map" which demonstrates that it was more then a mere missclick, and that you don't have a
very good idea of how to spell balanced.

Perhaps the most clear evidence that your comments are of low quality is your inability to
capitalize espeicially at the start of each given sentence. In all due resepct the 7th grade
majority speaks at about your level; 7th graders have ~about the same degree of
grammatical errors as you to say the least.

In refference to the statement "grammar nazi," I've herd several debaters of differing skill
levels say "grammar is of great importance in debates" (not precisely), and I've greatly
adduced that your of a great lack in the essential branch of linguistics reffered to as
"grammar." This clearly corroborates the statement "You debate at a appallingly low level."

felix45 (11/03/2006 02:27pm):
haha I bet you cant get your hand out of your pants over my grammar. keep on strokin son!
THATS THE WAY OF THE GRAMMAR NAZI!

it isnt that I cant capitalize or do other stupid crap like that, it is more of this is a GAME and as
a GAME I hardly take it seriously. I dont feel the need to crap my pants over spelling on a site
that is supposed to be for fun. but if you want to be a little nazi about spelling and other crap
you can clearly understand go right ahead nazi boy. I could care less.



so, what you are saying is you for sure have solid proof that 1 infantry per base in a 3p FFA
on a map such as this is unbalanced automatically and player 3 has a huge advantage.
show me if this is what you are saying, if not, then stfu and gtfo. kthxbai



oh yeah, almost forgot!
bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch
Zero_X_Axl (11/04/2006 02:51pm):
WTF is with all the blackness?

?/10
jhuni (11/05/2006 07:47pm | Edited: 11/08/2006 07:21pm):
I disregard the comment "grammar nazi," because it's probalisticly synonymous with
intellectually superior, and it's used in a attempt to abate the degree of coherence of your
ignorance, which I've accumulated an excessive amount of evidence for.

RE: -- "it isnt that I cant capitalize or do other stupid crap like that"

If it's stupid crap, it's more then likely that you can't do it, because it's stupid since you can't
do it in the first place, and I've seen the low level of speech, and understanding you have.
Considering that my comments are inapprehensible to you.

so, what you are saying is you for sure have solid proof that 1 infantry per base in a 3p FFA
on a map such as this is unbalanced automatically and player 3 has a huge advantage.
show me if this is what you are saying, if not, then stfu and gtfo. kthxbai

You have no clue what I'm saying. I never said anything along the lines of "sure have solid
proof," but I was using the 1 base infantry concept as reasoning, but clearly you don't
understand what I was saying -- the correlation of 1-1 in infantry-base is a STA concept,
is of the basis that the general concept of the 'capturing stage' is building infantry.

In refference to that part "is unbalanced automatically" -: again I never said anything about it
being automatically so clearly you don't know what I'm saying.

show me if this is what you are saying,

So you've admited that my words were incomprehensible to you, and this thus greatly
adduces that your speaking at a low level, along with your grammatical capabilites being
of the age of a 12 year old, ~or more precisely: a 7th grader.

I don't know if your 12 years old, or not, but I do know that your intellectually developed to
approximately the same degree as a 12 year old.
felix45 (11/06/2006 09:01pm):
lol nazi boy still cant get his hands out of his pants over my grammar.

have you come yet? sounds like it to me, not sure though.



the game you made isnt for 3p or under the circumstances this game presents in the least,
but I'm playing on it anyways. I want to see if I can beat you even though you have the
advantage. what I'm getting at (because you clearly missed the point) is that by going 3rd GE
needs the 1 infantry per base to make up for starting funds, and that there are 2 bases so
there isnt that advantage which you say there is.

But, you clearly looked past this, automatically declared it unbalanced, and acted like the
retard you are, trying to disprove my argument through grammar. (which btw didnt work,
and wont ever work in any argument)

So, if you really want to disprove me and show this map is unbalanced, you need to make a
new map, give each side 2 bases, 6k starting funds from cities/HQs/bases, and BM 2
infantry.

Now, going back to what I refered to earlier. hell I'll just quote myself on this one.
"each country starts with 2 bases. are you blind? can you not count? are you really so
dumb?"


the only country that could possibly have an advantage is GE but with the income at the start
I believe the infantry is needed. and going back to what I said earlier on 3p games there isnt
any way as of now that anyone really knows of to show whether there is FTA or not
because there has yet to be a balanced 3p map, allthough this is the closest I have seen. not
to mention with the starting income it is possible for both BM and OS to build recons against
GE and infantry against eachother, putting GE at a huge disadvantage at the start, meaning
that the infantry are very much so needed.

Really, you factored nothing into your argument except that STA exists with 1 starting base
each and 1 infantry to counter it, which relates absolutley none whatsoever to this map
seeing as each player has 2 bases and a larger than normal income to start.
Pyrranha (11/27/2006 08:47pm):
jhuni is right. This arguement is over.
jhuni (01/19/2007 07:29pm | Edited: 07/17/2007 09:28pm):
I beat him in such "arguement" a long time ago.

Belgain Roffles followed my suggestion anyways he fixed the STA.
Deathwind (11/27/2007 10:05pm):
It's not grammar anyways, it's spelling.
UltimaOblivion12 (12/13/2007 07:41pm):
...
Milka (12/15/2007 11:07am | Edited: 12/15/2007 11:07am):
I put it a 8 \o/
Backstab (01/05/2008 03:06pm):
I've always loved your maps Belgain! 10/10
Dr.Chaos (03/05/2008 02:40pm | Edited: 03/15/2008 04:10pm):
l
TheSillyPepper (04/12/2018 01:27pm):
teleporting for the orange team is broken, game just crashes when trying to move from left to middle.
Xmo5 (06/07/2018 01:31pm):
Quality conversation here. *thumbs up*
Meta Rexy (08/06/2018 12:14am):
Yea when you look back at how you conversed on the internet ten
years ago it tends to make you cringe a little. I do at least...
FeelDaThunda (03/04/2023 08:29pm):
Can't believe this man spelled balanced with a double L... what a clown fr
Cosechador (04/02/2023 02:47pm):
Epic conversation between two humans
Ale2007 (06/18/2023 08:36pm):
Epic disscusion



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.