Creator: zxp || First Published: 12/08/2006 || Players: 2 || Size: 11x5
Categories: None
Rating: 6.80 in 10 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
PyRo_VeX (12/09/2006 07:41am):
Looks good, but you can't get to the cities in the corners because T-Copters can't drop off
one sea. So make a shore or something next to it so you can drop off. Otherwise it looks
good.

8/10
Dokan (12/09/2006 11:51am):
This is kindle and lash heaven.
Dragon_Walker (12/14/2006 11:38am):
Pros:
Quick Battle
Not base heavy
FTA Fixed

Cons:
Chokepoints
No Plains, too much Cities and Forests
Bad map name
Kindle And Lash heaven

My rating: 6/10
It has potential and it is a serious try to make a quick map, but it has some flaws.
Try to fix those.
hudad55 (12/15/2006 10:58am):
Umm. . . why don't OS get an infantry at the start?
TacticsCommand (12/16/2006 02:14pm):
haha, noobs these days...
jhuni (01/02/2007 05:04pm):
"Umm. . . why don't OS get an infantry at the start? "

A fine point; OS should get a infantry at the start. It would actually improve the map.
Based off of the 1:1 base to infantry ratio, and widely proven postulate. STA.
It would be improved in the sense that a infantry is added on the OS HQ, and BM's infantry is
pushed slightly forward, although there are better forms of balance it would be an
improvement.

"haha, noobs these days... "

Actually a noob statement would be "why does BM have a infantry," and not "why doesn't OS
have an infantry." Based off of the conspicuous relevance of the STA postulate.

Heres my rating.
-1 Centralized base greatly augments the STA.
-1 STA, based off of the 1:1 ratio.
-1 Terrain variety is quite bad; lack of reefs/plains.
-1 Overly choke-pointy and a clear lack of wide openness.
-1 Too many cities for the bases, and too small for effective airport usage based off of
funds.
5/10.



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.