Triple Triad
Creator: Mark998 || First Published: 11/03/2007 || Players: 4 || Size: 32x32
Categories: None
Rating: 8.33 in 3 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
Mark998 (11/03/2007 10:24pm):
It's been a while since I made a map. Before I playtest this, I want the following
questions answered:
-Have I balanced FTA fairly?
-Are there too many production properties?
-Is it too closed in?
Leave comments please.
Shadow Star (11/03/2007 10:34pm | Edited: 11/03/2007 10:55pm):
GE and Yc have an advantage over OS and BM. an infantry counter works best when you
have 1 infantry per 2 bases.
44 production facilities on teh map is a little high.
I'd say that the best action would be to change the furthest out neutral base to a city, and
add some shoals on the port islands, and cut back to one port.
The airports are in a bit of a problamatic spot as the first person to build a copter can attack
the second person most of the times. (meaning move them further away.)

I feel as though you could add some more pipe seams leading into the center area as without
those it will lead itself to a very tough chokepoint.
You could add some more forests, and the roads could be a bit more proper and less
straight.

It's a very large improvement from your previous maps.
Shadow Star (11/03/2007 10:34pm | Edited: 11/03/2007 10:35pm):
stupid double posting.
Mark998 (11/04/2007 12:28am):
OK, I will playtest with this. THX for commenting.
Shadow Star (11/04/2007 12:37am):
Bm doesn't need a starting infantry btw.
also, for aesthetics, you could set the pipes up appropriately with pipe ends.
Mark998 (11/04/2007 12:42am):
Blame Intelligent Systems for not making 4-way pipes. :)
Shadow Star (11/04/2007 12:43am | Edited: 11/04/2007 12:44am):
no, that's not what I meant.
I meant when your pipes stop due to a pipeseam, have a pipe end. you can keep the seam,
it's just fine where it is, but the pipes that run to the pipeseam but aren't actually connected
to it, they could be pipe ends.

..That 10 isn't from me.
Mark998 (11/04/2007 06:56pm):
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHH.

Y'know, I think ratings should be ignored from now on. People can rate the same map
multiple times and one can't change his/hers rating. Complete crap.
Shadow Star (11/05/2007 11:24am):
might that be because your previous maps have rather poor standing due to low playability?
Mark998 (11/05/2007 06:21pm):
Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaybe.



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.