Creator: jwlx || First Published: 05/30/2008 || Players: 13 || Size: 13x18
Categories: None
Rating: 2.78 in 9 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
JoeVector (05/30/2008 07:40pm):
The sad thing is I was actually expecting a nice map when I saw the first part.
nerd-boy (05/30/2008 08:29pm):
Except the map itself is 13 players...
amthc356 (05/30/2008 09:38pm):
no obvious FTA issues here
meece? (05/31/2008 05:53am):
If: the black terrain was removed; the countries were rearranged so that every one
consitantly had the same number of enterences (2/3) enterances and indirects were banded
it would be....

slow.... very slow

And alliances almost essential to defeat anyone....
joemancan (05/31/2008 09:46am):
Lol grit
nirial1991 (05/31/2008 03:47pm):
You'd be forced to choose your units wisely because of space issues, more tactical map
than anything.

rast2 (06/01/2008 12:30pm):
Unless "tactical" now means the same as "shit", no.
adder 85 (06/02/2008 11:18pm):
Rast, keep your useless opinions to yourself. If you arn't going to provide useful information,
keep your mouth shut. I've been on this site for a long time (Although I no longer play games
on it), and the overall attitude of the players has gone down-hill. Must be an influx of
younger, less respectful, people.
EchelonThree (08/22/2008 11:00am | Edited: 08/22/2008 11:02am):
Being on a site for a long time doesn't mean that you're better.

Once again, some people never cease to continue spelunking into the lower depths of the
score to see if it is possible to score a perfect 1.00...

The map is a load of rubbish.

Adder, lrn2ply
adder 85 (10/11/2010 02:28am):
EchelonThree- Straw Man. 'Nuff said.

Doubt you are even here any more, but you are just as bad as Rast- for the same reason.
Seniority has nothing to do with it.

Echelon, lrn2studydebate.



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.