Snowlico's map 13
Creator: snowlico || First Published: 01/15/2009 || Players: 6 || Size: 40x40
Categories: None
Rating: 1.50 in 4 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
snowlico (01/15/2009 11:08pm):
In this game you should ban artillary and rockets so you can't attack from one island to
another.

You should also ban Javier so you don't get alot more defence.
airob (01/16/2009 10:48am):
so practically you ban indirects...so this battle is only direct-combat and becomes a
stalemate....which also cuts the options of the game by half
Everzwijn (01/16/2009 01:20pm):
FAIL
PCJedi (01/16/2009 02:30pm):
Yeah, this really doesn't look like that fun of a map. The concept of fighting everyone
at once is somewhat interesting, but this no indirect setup would turn it into a huge
stalemate.
Everzwijn (01/16/2009 07:14pm):
There's also massive FTA, and the number of comm towers is insane even with Javier banned.
snowlico (01/16/2009 08:04pm):
It would never become a stalemate. because if you capture someones HQ then all there
buildings become yours. Then you can either battle the opponants in those areas too or you
can leave them alone and concentrate where you have your HQs.

If it's too hard with all the com towers then I'll probbably replace them with missle silos.
Kensan (01/16/2009 11:18pm | Edited: 01/17/2009 01:04am):
What you should do to make this abit more interesting is create a few indentations on each
island buy removing some plains, and in these indentations place a shoal and naval base
next to it. Oh and remove all comm towers...

Oh oh and banning indirects is st00pid... island to island shooting is fun :)

And if your sooooooooooo hellbent on being against the indirect thing, FOW is a
good "balancer" for the indirects.
airob (01/17/2009 09:34pm | Edited: 01/18/2009 12:49pm):
(quoted snowlico)
"It would never become a stalemate. because if you capture someones HQ then all there
buildings become yours. Then you can either battle the opponants in those areas too or you
can leave them alone and concentrate where you have your HQs. "

yea but you said to ban indirects..so you can only fight the other HQ with direct.fire
units...so it means a TANK X ? battle in an extremely narrow path unlees your
using a colin-kanbei or hachi-kanbei tag and no one else
snowlico (01/21/2009 07:11pm):
If you really want to you don't have to ban indirects. The only reason I suggest doing that is
because The players that have there HQs closer together have a better chance because
they can use them to help defend there HQs that are on a different island. Here's an example
(If RF is losing on one of there islands then they can just build an indirect unit on one of the
neighboring islands and mabey defend it. but if BM is losing on one of there islands they
can't use indirects to help defend there other HQ.)
airob (01/23/2009 02:09pm):
winning over one battle...is beating totally the others isee



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.