Creator: ReneDupree7 || First Published: 10/29/2005 || Players: 8 || Size: 20x20
Categories: None
Rating: 5.95 in 20 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
ReneDupree7 (10/29/2005 05:16pm):
I hope you like my map enjoy it . If you dont like anything tell me before you rate It then I might
re-fix It alright good .
cakeman (10/29/2005 06:12pm):
Not to be rude but uhhh 3 pipe runners? doesn't that make it a bit too hard to get the bases
not to mention that it's uneven (ie; amount of pipes The other ones can't move.)
2 could be nice, but it's fairly solid.
Nyvelion (10/29/2005 07:04pm):
I like how the three piperunners on each side help defensively, that was a good idea to
put in. you get a 10.
Dullahan (10/29/2005 09:08pm):
The countries on the sides should start with more piperunners. Since they have a much
harder defensive position, they should also get more properties.
ReneDupree7 (10/30/2005 09:35am):
Nyvelion thank you for rating it a 10 huh .
laughing_corpse (11/04/2005 06:06am):
why do so many people give maps 10. Only perfect maps deserve 10, and theres no such
thing as a perfect map.
Stuffman (11/04/2005 11:55pm):
Because, Corpse, if you'll take a look at the little note under the rating dropbox, you'll see that
a 10 indicates Near Perfect, not actually perfect.

Now, onto the map. This looks like it would be really, really tough to break an opponents
defenses. 3 piperunners at start, not very many funds, very few neutral properties and not
much room to move. I think it's safe to say nobody would use their harbors because nobody
will be able to afford anything useful from them. I would replace that whole sea area with
some neutral property to fight over.
armorforSLEEP (11/08/2005 03:49pm):
i personnaly would say take some of the piperunners away...getting pummeled by three
piperunners in one turn means a very very long game..althogh...with the small amount of
prperties...it may not be that long...id have to play it
AzureDrag0n1 (11/14/2005 09:59pm):
Corner Properties have huge advantage. Piperunners likely to only be beaten by
Battleships. Corner piperunners immune to battleships. Corners should go last while HQs on
the sides should go first.
orangeelite (03/18/2006 07:31pm):
hmm this map is rather cramped and the players would have very little moving space to go
about... i believe just 2 pipe runners are enough. 3 is just too many. id give this map a 6/10
VGN (03/21/2006 10:45pm):
Why are the runners in some spots moved?!
Freezie (07/24/2006 12:13am):
Its too tight for players to move freely, also, the players at the sides of the map (Not
the corners) have disadvantage when ti comes to defending their base from an attack that
comes from 2 sides



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.