Creator: N/A|| First Published: 11/29/2005 || Players: 2 || Size: 25x17
Categories: None
Rating: 8.33 in 30 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
Neotherin (11/30/2005 03:26pm):
This map is extremely well designed. I'm playing a fog game and it's one of the best games
I've played in a while. There are many different ways to approach and attack here, which is
good. Players have strategic decisions and can't afford to do everything at once. Both
players can reach most of the areas with relative ease through the navy. Just the right
balance of land/sea.

Grit has some obvious advantages here, but nothing impossible to overcome. 10/10 for
balance and strategic options.
golden_cow2 (12/12/2005 02:46pm):

muhaha_ha (01/14/2006 07:57pm):
so good it can be a map off the official advance wars game, 9/10 for being symmetrical
Nyvelion (02/02/2006 02:57pm | Edited: 02/07/2006 07:25am):
Looks good except for the minor problem noted on the tournament forums

EDIT: wth dude? Don't get mad at me, I'm not even the one who pointed out the problem to
begin with, I'm just saying I agree with what others said about the shoals that make the
map broken.
(02/02/2006 05:52pm | Edited: 02/02/2006 05:53pm):
Check the name of the map if you're somehow displeased with me and if you are you can suck
it.
I had no idea the map was broken until the tournament, so blaming me for your own bad
decision of joining and losing is your own fault.

In other news, the map has been fixed well before your post.
lazernerd (02/10/2006 05:39pm | Edited: 02/11/2006 01:34am):
The two chokepoints do make Grit good but I love the map 9/10 b/c some roads are kinda
weird and there should be a little more sea.

And not to be dumb but what is "broken".....
(02/13/2006 10:45pm):
Broken means the map is unplayable in at least one aspect, which causes one player to have
a large advantage over the other. This map is unbalanced and I re-made it with the
necessary corrections.

Whirly

Oh and Nyvelion, you were beating a dead horse when you said that, which was the cause of
my statement. Nice to see you have edited it away though.
lazernerd (02/16/2006 04:37pm):
oh ok I didn't know what that meant



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.