Creator: THUNDER_5 || First Published: 03/26/2011 || Players: 14 || Size: 39x29
Categories: None
Rating: 6.50 in 2 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
THUNDER_5 (04/03/2011 04:06am):
Team Game.
OS + PL Vs. BM + TG Vs. GE + CI Vs. YC + PC Vs. BH + JS Vs. RF + AB Vs. GS + BD.

Comments and Ratings Welcome thanks!
Meta Rexy (04/07/2011 09:48pm):
all it takes is a few alliances and GS and BD get a tremendous advantage.
Well... I'd have to see how it plays out personally but I'm concerned about people
dropping out and imbalancing this map...
THUNDER_5 (04/08/2011 03:56am):
Believe me, im expecting people to drop out, but i just want a test for playability, then if all
goes well ill be using this map for private matches etc. if there are any imperfections
regarding terraining or unbalance issues then i shall edit as people say. thanks! :)
joeyeltaki (08/28/2011 07:31pm):
maybe some roads?

Broadside (11/02/2011 06:00pm):
agreed on the roads part, recons and rockets will have no mobility on this map...
Kruegster (11/04/2011 12:23pm):
Meta Rexy (04/07/2011 08:48pm):
"all it takes is a few alliances and GS and BD get a tremendous advantage."

But on the other hand, if GS and BD are not able to make many alliances, then they are
the ones at the disadvantage. GS and BD are the ones who can be attacked by
everyone. All the other players only need to be concerned about 3-4 players adjacent
to them. Also, GS and BD are separarated, so when one dies, the other can't take
those bases. Because of this, I disagree with Meta Rexy; BD and GS have the
disadvantage.
Nyvelion (08/29/2012 01:57pm):
The real disadvantage is for the teams on the top and bottom middle.



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.