Create Game
View Games
Planner
Map Analysis
View
Export
View Favorites
| For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat! |
| Comments: |
|
Mori2 (02/06/2013 12:33pm):
Something about guts. Changelog: |
|
Xmo5 (02/06/2013 02:08pm):
You really like making 1v1 3 base 1-2 airport land battles about this size with mild-moderately central HQs don't you? |
|
xushu (02/06/2013 03:27pm):
It's formulaic really, X... such a map-type tends to produce above-average-to-great maps. This one looks pretty good, imo~ |
|
Daehphone (02/06/2013 03:35pm):
Actually, mori makes 1v1 2-3 base 1-2 airport maps land battles about this size with mild- moderately central HQs. |
|
Mori2 (02/06/2013 03:50pm | Edited: 02/06/2013 03:52pm):
All this time I thought I was just making aggrocrags. In all seriousness if there's a bigger demand for things like 2 base or unusual HQ positioning I can work on that. I just make what I think works well in competitive play at the time haha. It gets harder to keep making 100% original content when you've made around 350 maps for a game. |
|
Xmo5 (02/06/2013 05:02pm):
Haha hey, I'm not complaining, they all look like good maps and there's nothing wrong with that.And hey, I can't blame you, you've made a ton more (better) maps than me, that's for sure. I just think its funny lol. Plus, they're the kind that work best for leagues and more competitive matches. And yes, I apologize HP, I didn't give any credit for the 2 base maps :P |
|
Mori2 (03/13/2013 05:34pm):
This turned out better than I thought it would when I made it. |
|
walkerboh01 (04/15/2015 03:06am):
As far as I'm concerned, any map that uses PL/AB is a tribute to me. But in seriousness, that airport gimmick is really neat. It would be cool even without the black boat, but that's a really nice touch. |
|
Argodan (04/16/2015 01:16pm):
That centre seems heavily set up to stalemate. There are effectively 0 realistically contestable cities there, and there's nothing to prevent stonewalling on that lovely clump of 3-star terrain. Add the short supply lines and I don't think it will ever be possible to launch an attack in the centre, because any imbalances in forces are easily corrected. In any case the airports already diverted play to the side enough that the centre is less useful, and the central terrain probably makes this even more noticeable. Not very nice IMO. Airport gimmick is nice but methinks it's too easy to AA or even missile lock the airports, allowing wins by stealth. The sides also don't have any easily contestable cities, all of them being in range of a tank from the nearest base, which makes this map rather stalematey in general. I recommend the map be overhauled to fix those issues, and/or dropped from the Z-games rotation immediately. |
|
walkerboh01 (04/16/2015 09:46pm):
Good call with regards to stalemates. The property distribution across the fronts, and maybe even the position of the neutral base, could be tweaked easily enough to promote less defensive tactics. With regards to the airport, I think the gimmick is fine. But you do raise a good point about stealths - rather than change the gimmick, I would just recommend that stealths be banned on this map. I agree that there is probably not much need to test the map further until changes are made. |
Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.