Preview Map

4*4

Creator: ryx || First Published: 10/05/2013 || Players: 4 || Size: 20x20

Create Game

View Games

Planner

Map Analysis

View

Export

View Favorites

Categories: None

Rating:

8.33 in 3 ratings

For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!

Comments:

the-deadly-shadow (10/05/2013 04:35pm):
FTA

TarquinMitzi3 (10/05/2013 04:50pm):
You can prevent first turn advantage by giving BM 1 pre deployed infanty, GE 2 and YC 3.

Yes no?

Bamboozle (10/05/2013 05:21pm):
For every two bases it's one infantry. If it's an odd number, add a preowned city near an enemy
base.

ryx (10/06/2013 05:39am):
I have changed any detail.
Is it better ?
I am entirely open critisism.
Don't hesitate for comment :).

the-deadly-shadow (11/06/2014 12:14pm):
I think the right counter would be that the player in the area of his HQ would have FTA over the others in THAT
area. I think this is fair. To get such a situtation, I think YC, BM, GE should have an infantery on every YC, BM,
GE base near their HQ. To prevent BM from being two turns in front of YC and GE at that area, you should give
YC and GE an infatery on their base on the area of the BM HQ. A similar situation holds for the YC base near
the GE HQ.

In this situation it is even fair that OS has FTA' over BM and GE around the YC HQ, as YC/GE has FTA' over
OS around the GE/BM HQ. I think that in this configuration something similar holds for all players.

with FTA' I refer to the advantage of a player after suggested correction.

I think that your counter isn't bad, but my suggestion is slightly better, as it is to my opinion the infantery which
can capture the neatral base is more inportant that the other infantery. So this shifts favour to the BM as they do
have the infantery to capture the base and are in front of GE and YC.

ryx (12/12/2014 04:21pm):
Ok i have modificated the map to comply with your comment.
And i add a lab to create some challenge and strategy to have indirect units.
Comments are welcome !