Create Game
View Games
Planner
Map Analysis
View
Export
View Favorites
| For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat! |
| Comments: |
|
Mori2 (08/12/2013 08:14pm):
I'm back from Otakon, and I come bearing gifts. |
|
Xmo5 (08/15/2013 03:28pm):
I'd love to go to Otakon someday, but I've never really been able to make it. Unfortunately I don't foresee it in my near future either :(... I'm pretty new at my job so I don't get a ton of vacation yet and that combined with big things happening, all my vacation for both this year and next were planned out since April lol |
|
Bamboozle (08/19/2013 07:44pm):
Two towers a side is a bit much, don't you think? |
|
Mori2 (08/25/2013 07:57am | Edited: 08/25/2013 07:58am):
Two towers is always tricky. Usually, the balance comes in with the application of the towers. For example, giving one tower early, but locking the second away on an island, makes the second tower only have an impact at the stage of the game when one player is comfortable enough to pay for a unit that can take an infantry to the second tower to capture it (Often a T Copter). Since the transport costs a significant amount of funds, but not an enormous amount, the players will have to weigh how much they value the weight of the second tower over deploying more expensive units to the fronts early on. A great example of this idea used correctly can be viewed here: http://awbw.amarriner.com/prevmaps.php?maps_id=57364 Another second take on the two-tower paradigm: http://awbw.amarriner.com/prevmaps.php?maps_id=56354 Often, problems would only arise if the two towers would not encourage interesting gameplay on the map, or if one player could somehow obtain 3 towers rather easily early on. |
|
SplatRIOT (04/14/2018 01:24am):
uhh |
Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.