Create Game
View Games
Planner
Map Analysis
View
Export
View Favorites
| Categories: None | ||
|
| For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat! |
| Comments: |
|
Dullahan (05/14/2005 12:31pm):
The 7 countries could use a few more neutral properties; as it is, they'll be squabbling over what few properties there are (or killing each other) while BH captures the rest of the map. Also, there are far too many airports for naval action to be feasible or useful, despite all of the neutral ports. Nice try, however. Basically, more properties, less airports. 5/10. |
|
COeagle (05/14/2005 02:26pm):
Oh, I forgot to explain. THIS IS TEH SEQUAL TO 1 on 6!!!!! Yeah. Everyone agianst BH. I made so that all countries get 9-11 properties each. A lot is scattered. I tried to make this map extremely detailed, fun challenging, and a huge battle than would last a long time. Those forests make you dizzy, don't they? The one-spaced ports are for defense only. I'll delete some of the NEUTRAL airports, but no owned ones. OS has the power of equality, any CO fits. Has all types of factories equaly. BM is a back-up country, not much for them, Colin or Adder would be good. GE has the power of sea, lots of it, on the defensive side, no airports for them. Drake. YC has the power of, power! Kanbei would be good, as they could fight on two fronts with more cash than the other countries. RF has the power of air, lots of it, and no ports for them. Eagle. GS has the power of land, lots of it, on the weak side of the river. Jess or Max. BD has the power of split, they may have lots of suff, but they are everywhere. Lash or Sami would be good. I made a few BH properties neutral in their side of the river, and an update is coming. Remember, this is a CHALLENGE! |
|
COeagle (05/14/2005 02:28pm):
Updated. |
|
COeagle (05/14/2005 02:31pm):
Oh, and the 7 countries ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ATTACK EACH OTHER. I wish AWBW had automatic team picks... I don't want to add a lot more neutrals to the alliance, since the map would be too overcrowded by buildings, which is ugly. |
|
Dullahan (05/18/2005 03:53pm):
I still think BH has more than enough airports to dominate the western river, especially considering that cruisers are really going to be hindered by the reefs. The ports help somewhat, but not quite enough. There's also going to be a major traffic jam around the GS port as long as teams are not implemented in AWBW. Also, GS actually has a much more balanced army than OS. One last thing... perhaps there could be fewer countries so that it would be easier to arrange games. It's somewhat improved: 7/10. |
|
COeagle (05/18/2005 09:47pm):
Thank you for the review, I'll delete ONE airport for BH, and thanks about GS (I'll keep GS tand OS the same). THE MAP IS CALLED 1 ON 7 SO NO ARMIES WILL BE DELTED ALSO BECAUSE I WANT THIS TO BE AN 8P MAP. Also I want a map where there are seven people (haven't done before) against black hole. |
|
kirant (07/01/2005 10:27am):
I problem, half the Seaports are ungrabable... |
|
COeagle (07/01/2005 05:29pm):
THEY'RE DEFENESE PORTS!!!!! THEY'RE NOT MEANT TO BE CAPTURED! WHY DON'T PEOPLE REALIZE THAT!!!? |
|
Metalic_Dragon (09/15/2005 11:09pm):
Liek wtf... A revised version where there are way less reefs would be nice. |
|
COeagle (11/05/2005 07:41pm):
No way Jose. That would be stupid. Anyway, HORRAY FOR TEAMS ON AWBW!!! This map is now playable, I started a game vs. BH. |
|
Nyvelion (12/01/2005 07:13pm | Edited: 10/15/2018 04:17pm):
--deleted-- My point was still correct... but I don't like the way I said it back then. Sorry about that. I was right, defense ports look utterly ridiculous and it's good that it never caught on, but I could have said that better. I was a teen back then, I didn't know better. Still should remove the weird looking ports. |
|
Shadow Star (12/05/2005 07:46pm):
10 -2 for giving BH all that property to amass early on. -2 for making BH have an almost inpenetrable defense except for mech rush (the river and all) +2 for idiots who decided to rate youn poorly on something that makes lash playable on sea, and for listening to Nyvelion talking about your mental state (i don't usually give bonuses just subtractions) 8/10 |
|
Mr. Warhammer (12/23/2005 06:44am | Edited: 12/23/2005 06:44am):
5 -10 map is crazy. +2 onlt 1 airport for BH -20 map is crazy(I Write It Before??) all: -13 points anyway: 1 point |
|
Blizz3112 (01/21/2006 04:51pm):
Funny map, but sorry I still see a lot of mistakes on the maps (even if some might be intentially), A little more Airports to capture could help out too... But the concept is nice and I know it's difficult to make such balance between the 7 allies versus the 1 enemy... |
|
RDS (01/24/2006 07:10am | Edited: 01/24/2006 07:10am):
10 -3 For size, a game on this will never end -2 For all those ports that make the map ugly and stupid -3 For the ultimate chokepoint bridge that leads to BH (Only one? WTF?) -2 For BH having an uber advantage, because the small armies cant build boats anyway with their low funds -3 As bonus -2 Because I don't like it -5 For non symmetry -5 For if it was symmetrical -1 For wasting my time on this -3 For wasting other people's time -2 For wating your own time -10 Because it's just stupid! |
|
DrakeColin (04/10/2006 03:22pm):
I like ports so I'll take 'em if ya'll don't want 'em!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 |
|
COeagle (08/16/2006 12:43pm):
RDS and Mr. Warhammer are fuhking n00bs who rate this badly. Go live in a trash can. This map deserves NO LOWER than a 5. Thanks for the comments ShadowStar, Blizz3112, and DrakeColin. I updated the map: more bridges on the rivers, balanced out both sides (gave BH less starting properties and each Allied team one more city), and added a big naval battle because no one would've built any ships on the older map... and the broken bridges/defense ports would make this interesting. Can I improve on anything else? I was thinking of adding Land and Air units here. If you think I should, what shall I add for each side? |
|
jhuni (10/30/2006 06:13pm):
RDS (01/24/2006 06:10am): -10 Because it's just stupid! You didn't have to put anything but that ok? |
|
Calvacadeofcats (10/30/2006 10:23pm):
I actually like this map. It's a little crowded, and I'm not a fan of large-scale predeployed forces, but it really does look like it could be interesting and fun to play. Whatever's wrong with defense ports, anyway? |
|
COeagle (12/06/2006 08:34pm):
jhuni is a fukking asshole. Calvacadeofcats, thanks for the support. |
|
jhuni (07/27/2007 06:43pm):
I'm sorry if some people have reached that erroneous discernment. However, I do not mind your acknowledgement of your current feelings of me. Hate and love are one in osho philosophy, for you information. One cannot be without the other. |
|
DuelStriker (08/06/2007 08:28pm):
This map is pretty bad. Everything is just scattered randomly. 4/10 +1 for effort. |
|
TheGreen246 (03/12/2022 07:50pm):
Oldest map? |
|
ShiningForce4 (04/25/2024 04:28am):
Love the ports no one can use haha |
Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.