Small but Terrible
Creator: jhojoe || First Published: 01/11/2006 || Players: 2 || Size: 11x11
Categories: None
Rating: 4.62 in 92 ratings
For design map discussion or to get suggestions from other users, visit the AWBW Discord Chat!
Comments:
AsaLothario (01/22/2006 10:21am):
Ooh, I don't think I'm liking this. The person that goes first is going to get a bit of a dominatrix
going on. Not only that, but it might be very likely for that person to shut down the opponent's
initial bases, making it a clean sweep towards the HQ. My criticism is to have the initial bases
at least closer to the HQ, for things get a little crammed. These are the kind of maps that
makes Grit so nefarious...
muhaha_ha (01/25/2006 06:22pm):
can u say, mech invasion?
IndirectDragon (01/26/2006 06:25pm):
mech invasion
Manetheran (02/09/2006 05:09pm):
try making the rivers into sea spaces to prevent mech invasions.
jhuni (03/27/2006 07:42pm):
First turn advantage
Heidern (03/27/2006 07:56pm):
mech invasion
Kamuscha (03/28/2006 05:32pm):
Indirect invasion
MattMartin (04/12/2006 06:02pm):
Kindle will soooooo kick ass in this map. Just build some piperunners and ur opponent is
Stuffed
jhuni (04/15/2006 04:30pm):
You do mean rockets right?

Scylira (04/19/2006 12:15am):
if you build a piprunner on a base with no pipes nearby, it can sit on the base and fire... not
too often used, but can be useful sometimes
Cow (05/12/2006 12:45pm):
i played my first game on this map
jhuni (05/12/2006 01:20pm | Edited: 11/24/2006 12:05am):
This map isn't balanced, I'm clearly not going to play on this.
Cow (05/12/2006 10:34pm):
wot maps do you like jhuni
jhuni (05/20/2006 12:03am):
Fair ones like these http://awbw.amarriner.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3736
sirfuxalot (06/16/2006 10:54pm | Edited: 06/16/2006 10:54pm):
piperunners can move on bases, so if theres a group of bases it can move around on it. bad
map. sensei, sami, grit, colin, hachi, and about every other CO would completley destroy GE
here.
IndirectDragon (06/30/2006 09:30pm):
monkey invasion
gunner1138 (07/10/2006 01:12pm):
Can you say "Grit = banned" ^_^
GaoGaoStegosaurus (07/25/2006 07:01am):
This map truly lives up to its name..
Kiyobi (08/03/2006 12:16am):
Least the map creator's honest.
chevyboy2.8 (08/13/2006 09:50pm):
biased
A nose (08/14/2006 06:05pm):
0________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________0
Calvacadeofcats (09/07/2006 02:55pm):
Toaster invasion
A nose (10/14/2006 01:11pm):
Calvacadeofcats (09/07/2006 05:55pm):
Toaster invasion

_____

0___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________0
jhuni (10/17/2006 06:14pm | Edited: 11/24/2006 12:05am):
The title fits the map perfectly =/ so I'll give you some credit for that... 3/10
Coiln (11/15/2006 05:50pm):
Mech Invasion
Rafa 322 (05/23/2007 12:50pm):
Good map
DuelStriker (07/15/2007 08:26am):
I like this map too 9/10
Normally I hate small maps but this is really goood
rast2 (01/04/2008 03:33pm):
sure is terrible
fta
Madman200 (01/25/2008 05:41pm):
Make the rivers into seas, remove the chopper forts(Airports).
That is all.
zywxn (04/26/2008 11:57pm):
FTA, Mech spam, what else? Too many bases for a small map. Maps this small also dont
deserve an airport. Replace some cities with terrain and some bases with cities.
Too much starting properties and GE will be surrounded within a few turns.
5/10
IchigoKurosaki (05/01/2008 05:53pm):
Not bad, 10/10 if you ban Grit, otherwise 5/10
war man gg (05/23/2008 09:34am | Edited: 05/23/2008 09:34am):
im not the man to spaek much or in this case typing but anyway i kind of like it it ends fast
meaning it wont drag on till someone qiuts
nirial1991 (05/31/2008 11:13pm):
You could substitute the rivers for pipes, but then people would probably complain about
chokepoints, either way, your map requires a breath of life.
blanci1 (06/01/2008 10:57pm | Edited: 08/26/2008 03:04pm):
this map is supposed to be small and terrible so dont change the basics.... people obviously
like it fast and furious ... just look at HUGE number of games played on this map ( 250-
ish) .... its a pity
that statistic is not advertised directly on map pages instead of the spiteful ratings ! (also 73
people have bothered to rate this map..another record?,, surely worth fixing up the fta !!)
There is a 60-40 win ratio , not surprising since theres no fta counter whatsoever. I think
any kind of counter would be better than nothing and probably considerably redress the
proven statistical imbalance. For example give the second player an infantry and a recon ?
Also the game-creator can ,for a change, make quite a new kind of game by, eg., putting a
mech ban !!
mathblitz (07/09/2008 03:25pm):
ah well im a nice person so 10/10
B4BY 0N B04RD (07/10/2008 09:59am):
Grit, Sami, Colin... Any one of them for OS would make this a total crush. Kill FTA plz
sulla (08/28/2008 01:51am):
DuelStriker (07/15/2007 08:26am):
I like this map too 9/10
Normally I hate small maps but this is really goood

lol this was back in the day when duel was a noob lol
LightEnergy (10/30/2008 10:09am):
wow! look cool i add 9/10 for your idea.
ChocolateVodka (11/12/2008 02:49am):
FTA, way to high initial income. First person can easily build some artillery or rockets before
the other and shut down factories, and cap the cities and starting factories rather easily.
cole35 (12/09/2008 05:46pm):
theres no labs
Sivarticus2 (04/13/2009 07:06am):
mech invasion.
Nyvelion (02/16/2012 10:32am):
I disagree with the map name.
This map is actually very big.



Advance Wars is (c) 1990-2001 Nintendo and (c) 2001 Intelligent Systems. All images are copyright their respective owners.